Key Insights:
- The DOJ sold Bitcoin despite Trump’s order to preserve it for the Strategic Reserve.
- Senator Lummis raised concerns about the U.S. government’s management of crypto assets.
- The sale exposes possible internal friction in implementing federal cryptocurrency policy.
- Lawmakers worry that selling Bitcoin may be a strategic mistake amid global competition.
U.S. Government Sells Bitcoin Despite Presidential Order
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently sold Bitcoin assets, despite an explicit directive from President Donald Trump to preserve them for the country’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The sale of these assets has raised serious concerns, particularly among lawmakers.
🇺🇸 JUST IN: DOJ SOLD BITCOIN DESPITE TRUMP’S STRATEGIC $BTC RESERVE ORDER
Sen. Cynthia Lummis:
“Why is the U.S. government still liquidating Bitcoin when President Trump explicitly directed these assets be preserved for our Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?
We can’t afford to squander… pic.twitter.com/D0KUJzHefy— CryptosRus (@CryptosR_Us) January 6, 2026
Senator Cynthia Lummis expressed her dissatisfaction with the situation. “Why is the U.S. government still liquidating Bitcoin when President Trump explicitly directed these assets to be preserved for our Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?” she asked. The senator emphasized the importance of safeguarding strategic assets, especially as other nations are increasingly accumulating Bitcoin.
Concerns Over Government’s Crypto Management
However, this sale has triggered a broader discussion about how the U.S. government is handling seized digital assets. Lawmakers are questioning whether federal agencies are adhering to presidential directives regarding the management of cryptocurrencies. The controversy highlights potential internal friction in the implementation of federal crypto policy.
In addition to raising questions about compliance with executive orders, the sale exposes a critical issue. Some believe that trading Bitcoin, an asset that cannot be printed, could be a strategic misstep when compared to liquidating traditional currencies, which are more easily controlled and printed.
The Strategic Misstep Argument
The decision to sell Bitcoin rather than preserving it for future use has stirred debate on its long-term economic value. Bitcoin is seen by many as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. Given its finite supply, some argue that it is more valuable in the long run than fiat currency, which can be printed at will.
By selling Bitcoin, the U.S. government may be trading a rare and potentially valuable asset for one that can be created without limit. “We can’t afford to squander strategic assets while other nations are accumulating Bitcoin,” said Senator Lummis. Her statement reflects growing concerns that the U.S. may be losing its competitive edge in the global crypto space.
